go here to buy my stock photography

 

Alan Creech
born: 09-25-1966
where: Harlan, KY
lives: Lexington, KY
married: to Liz - 21 yrs
children: 4 - Katey, Meaghan, Conor, McKenzie

 

Custom Search



038


Alan Creech's Facebook profile

Subscribe to a feed of stuff on this page... Subscribe to my
Flickr Photo feed

www.flickr.com
+ Alan's items Go to + Alan's photostream


> subscribe to my podcast


my recent posts

i don't know what to title this post
lent > focus
discernment and tradition > 1
life is long,, uh, short
respect
fundamentalist?
statements
prayer and memory
we got bikes
this is my body


sites & things i like

abbey of gethsemani
america magazine
ancestry.com
apple computer
bbc voices - accent recordings
brother & sisters of charity
catholic peace fellowship
christian flights intl.
commonweal magazine
food network
google
guinness kentucky fish & wildlife
mac rumors
national catholic reporter
new american bible
thomas merton center
trout unlimited


faith communities

christ the king
communality
diocese of lexington
matthew's house - ca
ordinary community
saint patrick's
vineyard central
the well

blogs i read

aaron klinefelter
aimee milburn
amy welborn
andrew jones
asbury seminary
boar's head tavern
brother maynard
bryan sherwood
catholic sensibility
chris marshall
dan phillips
david finch
debi warford
d.g. hollums
eric kieb
glenn johnson
heather hofacre
jason evans
jeff prosser
john michael talbot
jordon cooper
kevin rains
kyle potter
laura ogle
liz creech
matt smith
michael spencer
mike & amber bishop
palmer
paul fromont
roger bourland
scot mcknight
steve bogner
thom curnutte
tom ponchak
will humes


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.

March 02, 2006 > 11:30 PM
discernment and tradition > 2
So, as I said, there is some pre-made definition to this discernment process in some circles. One of the bigger circles is your friendly Roman Catholic arena. The standard party line is that there is a teaching Magisterium (The Pope, the Cardinals and the Bishops of the Catholic Church) who have the gift of the Holy Spirit so that they can discern and define this Sacred Tradition for the whole Church.

Another ready-made system is that of the general Evangelical Christian world. Here, the way to look at it is, and again, this is generally speaking, that there is no Sacred Tradition - no Truth we need to know as the Church that is carried to us in a way other than in Holy Scripture. So everything has to actively be "Biblical" - no pressure. The thing is, there are teaching traditions even here.

So, is there another way? Could there be another way to look at things? Obviously, I think so. Does it mean we have to fully do away with both the above ways of looking at things? Well, not exactly. I think there is something to the "teaching authority of the Church" but I'm not sure (well, I don't believe) it is entirely housed in the Episcopate of the Roman Church. Is some of it there? Sure, I think absolutely so. In my view, there may even be more than a healthy share located there. I'm also slightly certain of this: the whole Biblical thing, there's definitely something to that. The Bible certainly contains God's Word. What I don't think is very defensible is that there is no Sacred Tradition which flows along with the Scriptures, helping us be who we are created to be.

I'm asking a lot of questions so one more won't hurt: Where does that leave us? In a bit more complicated place I think. To a great extent we are left in the frightening hands of the Holy Spirit in us all as the Mystical Body of Jesus. Does that mean just what we feel in our insides from day to day? I hope that's not it. That's not scary, that's dangerous. Our discernment about such things must happen inside a context, a context of Christian community (you knew I was going to say that didn't you). And not just as a part of a faith community, but of a community that is itself a self-aware member of the whole catholic Church throughout the ages. We have to discern inside the context of the whole Church, not just our feelings, not just our one little community, not even just our slightly larger faith-traditions. We must properly respect the Church of all time.

Our discernment process should be thorough and not sloppy. There's a lot to consider and we really can't afford to cut out big sections of Church history, for instance, in this work. We can't be afraid of what we will find. Scripture must be, of course, a big part of our "research" in this thing. Is there something we're doing that has changed from A to Z and back to A again in the life of the Church? That could be a good sign that this is a tradition we're talking about here as opposed to a Tradition we need to be concerned with holding onto.

I would say "practically" speaking, but I don't fully mean that exactly. I mean "spiritually" but that's not exactly it either. I'm going to invent a hybrid word here for my present purposes: spiritopractically - meaning, spiritually/practically speaking - practical as concerns the life of the spirit (not always the same kind of practical we are used to talking about). So, spiritopractically speaking, we need to be aware of what, in the life of the Church, in the churches, is actually harming people rather than helping them. Those things may be mistakenly given the title of Tradition of the Church when perhaps they never should have been.

I want to be clear that we should be very careful not to make this area about our particular likes and dislikes as far as what we may consider harmful. It should also not be an area where our emotions are consulted as experts in theology, either that or purely pragmatic concerns. I've talked about that before. We may feel some things are harmful when they truly are not. We may feel this because we are immature and not yet formed as a "adult" Christian. That's not bad, it simply is what it is - some are "babies," "children" and some are "adults" or "parents" in the faith. It's a continuum of growth and development.

OK, a book or three, could easily be written on this subject, and I'm sure a few have been. I say that so we know not to expect too much here. I'm sharing some thoughts, hopefully some helpful ones. This is something I have, and I'm sure many of us have, dealt with. These are important things I'm sure we're still dealing with. This, for me, is part of that process. So, in order not to go on forever in this setting, I'll try to share a few parting thoughts on what we should take into consideration in our discernment about Sacred Tradition...
  • We should realize that there is, in fact, a real Tradition of the Church that has been handed down through it's whole history - that these things are important and the Holy Spirit wants us to know and keep these things, for our good and healthy development.

  • We should consider the writings of and about the earliest Christians, those who were close to the Apostles and their disciples.

  • We should consider what has past the proverbial test of time - those Traditions which have been with us, the whole Church, since the earliest times without significant change.

  • We should consider what the Church has said as it has gathered together, with it's leaders, in councils from time to time in history.

  • We should consider, as concerns "t"raditions, that which has arisen in the churches because of their cultural context, because of when they existed in history and things of this nature - these as opposed to that which was passed down from the beginning.

  • We should consider, spiritopractically, what is helpful and what is harmful to the proper development of God's people into who and what they were created to be. If something is, in this context, obviously harming this process, we are obligated to thoroughly examine the tradition in order to see if it, indeed, should be retained.

  • We should consider our own mature common sense in discerning these matters. We should not consider this common sense in a personal vacuum, but in the context of healthy Christian community.

  • We should take seriously into our consideration, the Teaching authority of our leaders, our Pastors, Abbots, Priests, Bishops and Spiritual Directors, with proper and balanced respect for their charism (their gift) and their spiritual maturity.

  • We should, of course, pray and depend on the interior light and life we have been given by the presence of the Holy Spirit inside us. Our ability to see or hear this, to pay attention to this reality, is dependent on our own spiritual development and maturity.
All these things, and I'm sure a few more, should be taken together, as a whole, and not one thing to the exclusion of the others. That's where we get in trouble I think. We pick our favorite way, or something that we shouldn't consider, and end up in a land short of where we should be. This is a hard thing to "finish" so I'll just stop here. I think I've said more than enough. I've said what I wanted to say. I hope it has been helpful in some way. Peace be with you.

technorati tags > , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , ,

0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

| permalink | e-mail me |



daily prayer

ordinary time
psalter week 3
LOTH book 3

> morning - lauds
> evening - vespers
> night - compline
> e-breviary.com

lectionary readings

> today

stations of
the cross
meditation
here





my blog post labels

blogging
catholic
christian life
church
community
cooking
emerging church
family
fishing
ireland
leadership
liturgy
liturgical gangstas
liturgical prayer
merton
monasticism
pacifism
personal
photography
prayer
reversion
soteriology
spiritual formation
theology


archives



august 03
july 03
june 03
may 03
april 03
march 03
february 03
january 03
december 02
november 02
october 02
september 02
august 02
july 02
june 02
may 02
march/april 02
february 02