go here to buy my stock photography
------------------------------------

Alan Creech
born: 09-25-1966
where: Harlan, KY
lives: Lexington, KY
married: to Liz - 20 yrs
children: 4 - Katey, Meaghan, Conor, McKenzie


Custom Search


Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google




008

123

My Amazon.com Wish List

Alan Creech's Facebook profile

Subscribe to a feed of stuff on this page... Subscribe to my Flickr Photo feed
www.flickr.com
adcreech's photos More of adcreech's photos




> subscribe to my podcast


Mark Palmer Memorial Fund




my recent posts |::

i still believe
last day
happy new year
magdalen
the troubles
have we ever once...
measuring spiritual progress
basic features of your powerbook
Merry Christmas!
3 from 2005 > 3

stuff |::

my family
abbey of gethsemani
new american bible
thomas merton center
apple computer
google
off-the-map
christian flights intl.
food network
trout unlimited
guinness

faith communities |::

vineyard central
matthew's house - ca
the landing place
ordinary community
saint patrick's
indy church
the well
communality
vineyard of montpelier
christ the king
diocese of lexington

blogs i read |::

aaron klinefelter
aimee milburn
amy welborn
andrew jones
asbury seminary
beth keck
boar's head tavern
brother maynard
bryan sherwood
chris marshall
dan phillips
darren rowse
david finch
debi warford
d.g. hollums
eric keck
eric kieb
glenn johnson
heather hofacre
jason evans
jeana clark
jeff prosser
john michael talbot
jordon cooper
kevin rains
kyle potter
laura ogle
lisa ponchak
liz creech
malcolm hawker
michael spencer
mike & amber bishop
mike noakes
palmer
paul fromont
pete matthews
peter white
roger bourland
scot mcknight
steve bogner
steve thompson
tom ponchak
will humes

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.


January 04, 2006 >> 10:32 PM
the problem with pragmatism

pragmatism |ˈpragməˌtizəm| |ˌprøgməˈtɪzəm| |ˌpragmətɪz(ə)m| noun 1 a pragmatic attitude or policy : ideology was tempered with pragmatism. 2 Philosophy an approach that assesses the truth of meaning of theories or beliefs in terms of the success of their practical application.

We have a problem these days it seems. I'm not sure it's only a product of "these days" but I do know I see it constantly now. The concept of pragmatism that we see in terms of a philosophy of life in connection to Christianity and our theology can cause lots of problems. For one thing, the essence of our faith isn't a very pragmatic thing. It's outlandish. It's crazy. It really makes no sense. If you get it to a place where it makes too much normal sense, you've gotten it, I think, too far out of it's center. You have made it something too palatable. You have taken it's face off and made it unrecognizable.

How does this work? I can only say how I've seen it work. The typical rhetoric you hear is usually something about how to make the Christian life "livable." First I'll say I understand this because there are many ways to look at living a life as a Christian which are too heavy, too much. I cast that off myself. Specifically calling for quick "perfection" is problematic. It's extreme in a bad way. I think there are good extremes but this is not one of them. Boom! You're saved! Now behave yourself, you have no excuse now, you know the Truth! Well, we don't have to be a pragmatist to know it doesn't work that way. I didn't say I don't want to work it that way. I said it does not work. There's a difference.

This notion of livability is a difficult one. I'll admit that. We're talking about people who are interiorly torn asunder, severely broken. Even when we are connected to the Life of God in and through Jesus and are indwelt by the Holy Spirit - even then, parts of us are still cracked and broken, in need of repair, actually of remaking. What happens though, is that we get things confused. Natural, I suppose. I mean, it makes sense that we wouldn't immediately know how things work. We try sometimes to figure things out from where we are and merely from the place in which we stand in our present development as a person. If we do this alone and do not consider what is beyond where we are, what can and should be, then we cripple our own deductions.

We cannot though, especially because of this brokenness and need of transformation - we cannot be the measure of whether or not something will "work." If our experience of being transformed is not perfect, if we aren't experiencing God or His Life in the way we've been told we're supposed to - or even in the real way we should - we can't allow that to be the ruler with which we measure truth and God's will. That would be a blind man interpreting the light. The whole thing is bigger than us, than any of us and all of us. How it all works is often beyond us. That doesn't mean it doesn't work though. Simply because we don't see empirical evidence cannot be interpreted to mean there is nothing there or that our experience then trumps all. That one step goes off a nasty cliff. Faith is more mysterious than that. The kind of seeing that is done by faith doesn't always make sense. It isn't always readily apparent with the senses. It gets clearer though. The more we "see" by faith, the more we see in reality and that reality, God's reality, trumps all.

There are things we must accept whether we like them or not. We are broken. Our minds don't understand or think properly. Our hearts are deceptive and want things they should not want. We are drawn to the fire. A pragmatic theological philosophy can cause us to find ways to live in the fire. We say something like, "Well, we're here in the fire and the heat all around us. It doesn't seem to be going away, so we must find a way to live in it, with it. We must embrace the heat." Maybe we do research and make fire-suits. Perhaps we develop a skin conditioner which helps ease the pain. Maybe it even numbs us so we feel nothing. Still the heat cooks our skin - the radiation poisons us.

I know all this is somewhat vague. There are so many things that will fit inside this scenario I won't even try to bring them up. I simply think it needs to be said that being lead by pragmatism in doing theology or shepherding people, spiritual direction, etc. is not healthy. When we do this, we forget the greatness of God. We put aside His power and His willingness to really help us, His ability to transform our lives at the very deepest level. Instead, we focus merely on what's happening in front of us. Hell, if that's all it's about, we have no hope at all. I could understand giving way to a pragmatic approach. But the Holy Spirit is alive in this realm of reality! Let's not think and act as if we have no other recourse but our own minds and schemes. That's disaster. I don't know what else to say about it. I've rambled enough. Hopefully it was somewhatcoherentt. Grace and Peace be with you.

technorati tags > , , , ,

Labels: ,

::: ::: permalink ::: e-mail me :::

 

 

 


daily prayer |::

ordinary time
psalter week 1
LOTH book 4

> morning - lauds
> evening - vespers
> night - compline

> e-breviary.com

lectionary readings |::

> today



stations of
the cross
meditation
here


three quotes |::

"Then, if we cannot as yet think alike in all things, at least we may love alike. Herein we cannot possibly do amiss."
John Wesley

"Keep your eyes on the crucifix, for Jesus without the cross is a man without a mission, and the cross without Jesus is a burden without a reliever."
Fulton J. Sheen

"...I am deeply convinced that the Christian leader of the future is called to be completely irrelevant and to stand in this world with nothing to offer but his or her own vulnerable self."
Henri Nouwen



my blog post labels |::

blogging
catholic
church
community
cooking
emerging church
family
leadership
liturgy
merton
monasticism
personal
reversion
spiritual formation
theology

zines |::

next wave
the ooze
ginkworld
house2house
ship of fools
christianity today
regenerator

archives |::



august 03
july 03
june 03
may 03
april 03
march 03
february 03
january 03
december 02
november 02
october 02
september 02
august 02
july 02
june 02
may 02
march/april 02
february 02